Quantcast
Channel: VMware Communities: Message List - vSphere™ Storage
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5826

Re: 3PAR Peer Persistence (Metro Storage Cluster) needs reboot ?

$
0
0

I'm having similar issues with 3PAR StoreServ 7400.  I only experienced the problem with 1 host out of 10 most recently, however.  All of the 9 working hosts enumerated the paths as {TPG_id=258,TPG_state=STBY}{TPG_id=257,TPG_state=AO}.  As a matter of fact, I have 3 other clusters which all enumerated the TPG_IG as 257 and 258 - and they all switched over without issue.   The non-working host enumerated the LUNs as {TPG_id=258,TPG_state=STBY}{TPG_id=256,TPG_state=AO} before and after the failover. After a reboot, the host changed to {TPG_id=258,TPG_state=STBY}{TPG_id=257,TPG_state=AO} and a subsequent test failover succeeded without issue. 

 

[Side note - I did not let the host get to a point that it froze.  I noticed in prior failures like this that if I watch the vmkernel.log I could ID and see that the switchover did not recover paths and fail back to the original source array and it would correct the problem.  Like you said, a reboot also corrects the problem, but that kills the whole point of Metro Storage Clustering, in my opinion.]

 

My question would be is it coincidence that working hosts have TPG_ID of 257 and the failing host has a TPG_ID for the Active/Optimized path as 256?  Does the TPG_ID have significance - does it represent something?  I am really doubting it is random since I have approximately 21 hosts that enumerate the same way - {TPG_id=258,TPG_state=STBY}{TPG_id=257,TPG_state=AO} - and one broken one that enumerates with a different ID.

 

Any help from vSphere storage gurus is appreciated!  HP Support is working very hard with me to resolve this, but I thought I would throw this specific TPG_ID question out to the VMware community.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5826

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>